Walking to my nightmare…85% of our clients expect us to get them new business. We are only measured by net new revenue. This is why I am working on a website as a service and sales training.
I was surprised that the average monthly spend on SEO was so low. But then I looked at the report and saw that the results were FAR worse than that. Let me explain what I saw.
The annual spending chart leaves out the number of clients spending between $1,000/year and $5,000/year. But we can calculate that from the chart. 50% of the clients spend UNDER $1,000/year and about 2% spend OVER $25,000 a year. This leaves 48% between the top and bottom categories. Of that it looks like 13% are spending over $5,000/year, leaving 35% spending between $1,000/year and $5,000/year. When you plot out this curve the magic figure of $6,000/year, which is the average spend looks like it is at around the 10% level. So a total of around 88% of clients spend less than the average amount and only 12% of clients spend more than the average. This tells me that the distribution is being pretty badly skewed by a few very high spenders.
I thought that maybe the average spend was being skewed lower because a big percentage of “Under $1,000/year” spend segment actually were not working with SEO providers and their zero spend would be pulling down the overall average. As I found deep in the report this was true…to an extent. 10% of the clients indicated they had worked with ZERO agencies in a year. Including those in the average spend calculation does skew the results towards the low side. But with only 10% spending zero this does not create enough impact to make a big difference.
None of this changes the FACT that only 12% of clients spend more than $500/month….with something in the range of 2% spending $2,000 a month. Based on this from the videos you have been doing about your agency I have to say that you are doing far better than GREAT.
My question is can you actually generate the kind of results for a small business for $500 a month so that they will be happy with the results you deliver? And more significantly what can you do for a client who is spending $85/month with you (like 50% of the respondents to this survey are spending with their provider)? (Actually the average spend of that segment would be higher since 10% out of the 50% did not work with an SEO agency…so if you factor those people out of the picture the average spend in this lower market segment is more in the neighborhood of $100/month…but again what can you do for a client for $100 a month?)
Walking to my nightmare…85% of our clients expect us to get them new business. We are only measured by net new revenue. This is why I am working on a website as a service and sales training.
I was surprised that the average monthly spend on SEO was so low. But then I looked at the report and saw that the results were FAR worse than that. Let me explain what I saw.
The annual spending chart leaves out the number of clients spending between $1,000/year and $5,000/year. But we can calculate that from the chart. 50% of the clients spend UNDER $1,000/year and about 2% spend OVER $25,000 a year. This leaves 48% between the top and bottom categories. Of that it looks like 13% are spending over $5,000/year, leaving 35% spending between $1,000/year and $5,000/year. When you plot out this curve the magic figure of $6,000/year, which is the average spend looks like it is at around the 10% level. So a total of around 88% of clients spend less than the average amount and only 12% of clients spend more than the average. This tells me that the distribution is being pretty badly skewed by a few very high spenders.
I thought that maybe the average spend was being skewed lower because a big percentage of “Under $1,000/year” spend segment actually were not working with SEO providers and their zero spend would be pulling down the overall average. As I found deep in the report this was true…to an extent. 10% of the clients indicated they had worked with ZERO agencies in a year. Including those in the average spend calculation does skew the results towards the low side. But with only 10% spending zero this does not create enough impact to make a big difference.
None of this changes the FACT that only 12% of clients spend more than $500/month….with something in the range of 2% spending $2,000 a month. Based on this from the videos you have been doing about your agency I have to say that you are doing far better than GREAT.
My question is can you actually generate the kind of results for a small business for $500 a month so that they will be happy with the results you deliver? And more significantly what can you do for a client who is spending $85/month with you (like 50% of the respondents to this survey are spending with their provider)? (Actually the average spend of that segment would be higher since 10% out of the 50% did not work with an SEO agency…so if you factor those people out of the picture the average spend in this lower market segment is more in the neighborhood of $100/month…but again what can you do for a client for $100 a month?)
Thanks for sharing that report on how SMBs buy and react to SEO services!
Great report. Glad to hear you are one of the few that talk about how important having account managers and looking at churn rates.
Untitled
Anyone else sees this ?
I